October 10, 2007

At last – social researcher debunks ‘generations’ label

This has been a bee in my bonnet (which sounds a trifle nasty, doesn’t it?). Generations don’t happen in waves, they happen all the time, seamlessly. To say that because some individuals are born in a particular cluster of years “makes” them a “Boomer” or a part of generations “X” or “Y” and thus gives them certain shared characteristics ignores individuality, parental modeling, the role of genetic variation and the fact that humans are adaptive and will change their behaviours to suit conditions.

At worst it’s just lazy, convenient labelling. At best? Well it’s harmless fun, innit? I don’t doubt that people are affected by both their environment and the events within their lives, but just because the World Wars demonstrably affected a wide selection of the world’s population severely and disastrously doesn’t make it follow that forever more whatever happens will be reflected in some measurable mass generational change of mindset. If we look hard enough we’ll find “something”, but that’s humanity for you – looking for patterns and finding “something”. Like a face on the moon and animal shapes in clouds, or the stars above.

So in today’s Sydney Morning Herald we finally find a change in thinking: There is a little bit of generation Y in us all, says a leading researcher who believes it is time to rip up the generational rulebook and rethink the way we view people’s behaviour. Rather than break down the population into demographics based on age, Mark McCrindle says it is time to look at a whole chunk of Australia as one group based on attitude, or as social analysts like him call it, psychodemographics. And, he says, the prevailing mind-set in the future is that of generation Y.

It’s still a case of looking for a pattern and giving it a label, but at least we are shaking off this “born in year ‘x’ therefore you act like this” rubbish. Which only applies to the rich Westerners who are targeted by marketers anyway. But people are people, wherever they are, and individuals. Let’s treat them as individuals.
Or am I just acting like a wrathful Scorpio?

Filed under Humanity, Reasoned argument by Rob.

Comments

[...] Nation’s ‘first’ baby boomer applies for Social Security …Blogged about at At last – social researcher debunks ‘generations’ label – out out damned blog!, The nation’s “first” baby boomer, a retired teacher from New Jersey, applied for Social Security benefits Monday, signaling the start of an expected avalanche of applications from the post World War II generation. [...]

Login

These posts represent my opinions only and may have little or no association with the "facts" as you or others see them. Look elsewhere, think, make up your own mind. If I quote someone else I attribute. If I link to a web site it's because I have visited it myself and wish to refer to it, however that linking doesn't denote, imply or suggest any ownership, agreement with or control over that content. If an advertisement appears it's because I affiliate with Google, Amazon and others similar in nature and usually means nothing more than that... the Internet is a wild and untamed place folks, so please tread warily. My posts do not constitute consultation, advice or legal opinion of any sort.

All original material is copyright 2010 by myself, too, in accord with the Creative Commons licence below.

Creative Commons License
GTVeloce blog by Robert Russell is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License.
Based on a work at gtveloce.com.