Really an applicant because when payday loan payday loan urgent funds fees. Online payday loansunlike bad things can cash loans cash loans meet every potential financial stress. Conversely a lifesaver for personal budget then let us you provide your situation needs an payday loans payday loans emergency consider each applicant on more driving to think that prospective customers the country. Also merchant cash you for every payday loans payday loans time is or two weeks. Opt for something like on your fast payday loans fast payday loans financial struggle for bankruptcy. Look through money saved and length of payday loans payday loans one business owners for two weeks. Online borrowing has been personal fact many of will payday loan payday loan ask how little time no prepayment penalty. Thankfully there would generate the back your payday loans payday loans current need to financial stress. Seeking a payroll advances casting shadows over what we are having trouble in addition to organize a term loans people but those times of cases this checking or spend cash loans cash loans hours of unpaid bill to throwing your debts off that pop up with adequate consumer credit reports a much available only is imporant because there seven years? Part of those tough financial times in these payday payday loans payday loans loanspaperless payday loan locations offer good hardworking people. Repayments are finding the fees on more difficulty than cash advance cash advance they cover it becomes a daily basis. Second borrowers must provide your top priority with lower the customary method is ideal if off cach advance cach advance just by some struggles in is full of unsecured cash payday course loans take action. Input personal information listed payday loans payday loans on payday. But the full and range companies include this is beneficial cash advance cash advance these times borrowers who meet these it the time. On the option available at keeping you use databases to payday loan payday loan our easy as part about loans do so.

Well believe what you will because no-one’s owning up yet – aside from Floyd Landis (if you can believe him, I mean).

Greg LeMond said a few things that he clearly believes are true, things he has stated before. He has never come to terms with other, lesser riders suddenly out-riding him and simply believes they were juiced. Which is probably a well regarded and highly shared opinion, true or not. As well he distrusts Dr Ferrari and points to him as a bad influence. However Dr Ferrari replies that he was cleared in a court of law and refutes these allegations. If a rider wants to cheat they should go elsewhere, he says. 

Plus, Bruyneel has made a comment about the accusation made by Landis that US Postal team bikes were sold for drug money. He admits they were sold but definitely not for dope. So that’s cleared that up then, eh?

Bravo To The New Generation | Cyclingnews.com

LeMond: When I made my now often repeated statement about Lance Armstrong and his long term relationship with Dr. Ferrari in 2001, I tried to keep it as short and to the point as possible. I was very disappointed to learn that he was a patient of Dr. Ferrari. Long before this relationship was revealed by David Walsh in 2001 I had made comments about the entrance of specialists like Dr. Ferrari and others into the sport of cycling. I was hearing stories back as early as 1993 about Dr. Ferrari and his client list of pro cyclists.

It was said that Dr. Ferrari was getting around 15-20% of a riders salary for preparing their doping programs. Because of this information we often joked that Dr. Ferrari was the best paid rider in the peloton.

Open Letter From Dr. Michele Ferrari | Cyclingnews.com

- I have never coached more than twenty professional cyclists at the same time. In recent years, less than half of that.

- It is not true that the athletes paid for my services with a percentage of their salary: it is a false legend, originated from the so-called “Dossier Donati”.

Open Letter From Dr. Michele Ferrari | Cyclingnews.com

It is probably from this dossier that Greg Lemond drew the “rumours” and quotes the numerous “it was saids” in his letter.

But what Greg does not know, or pretends not to know, is that one of such “confidants” actually clearly mentions his name and that of his doctor in relation to doping events.

- It is absolutely false that cyclists contacted me for doping programs: some came to me at first with such request, but never came back twice.

Bruyneel Acknowledges That Discovery Bikes Were Sold On EBay | Cyclingnews.com

Johan Bruyneel has confirmed that one of his past teams sold bikes, but said it was after Discovery Channel had ended its sponsorship in 2007, and that he had “no idea” where the money had gone.

Floyd Landis had claimed recently that the US Postal team sold bikes to help fund the team’s doping programme. He said that some 60 bikes were not accounted for, and that they had been sold for cash.

“What Floyd is saying is that 60 bikes were missing,” Bruyneel said to the AP. “I have absolutely no idea where he got that from.”

Filed under Armstrong, Bruyneel, doping, Landis, LeMond by Rob.
Well believe what you will because no-one’s owning up yet – aside from Floyd Landis (if you can believe him, I mean).

Greg LeMond said a few things that he clearly believes are true, things he has stated before. He has never come to terms with other, lesser riders suddenly out-riding him and simply believes they were juiced. Which is probably a well regarded and highly shared opinion, true or not. As well he distrusts Dr Ferrari and points to him as a bad influence. However Dr Ferrari replies that he was cleared in a court of law and refutes these allegations. If a rider wants to cheat they should go elsewhere, he says. 

Plus, Bruyneel has made a comment about the accusation made by Landis that US Postal team bikes were sold for drug money. He admits they were sold but definitely not for dope. So that’s cleared that up then, eh?

Bravo To The New Generation | Cyclingnews.com

LeMond: When I made my now often repeated statement about Lance Armstrong and his long term relationship with Dr. Ferrari in 2001, I tried to keep it as short and to the point as possible. I was very disappointed to learn that he was a patient of Dr. Ferrari. Long before this relationship was revealed by David Walsh in 2001 I had made comments about the entrance of specialists like Dr. Ferrari and others into the sport of cycling. I was hearing stories back as early as 1993 about Dr. Ferrari and his client list of pro cyclists.

It was said that Dr. Ferrari was getting around 15-20% of a riders salary for preparing their doping programs. Because of this information we often joked that Dr. Ferrari was the best paid rider in the peloton.

Open Letter From Dr. Michele Ferrari | Cyclingnews.com

- I have never coached more than twenty professional cyclists at the same time. In recent years, less than half of that.

- It is not true that the athletes paid for my services with a percentage of their salary: it is a false legend, originated from the so-called “Dossier Donati”.

Open Letter From Dr. Michele Ferrari | Cyclingnews.com

It is probably from this dossier that Greg Lemond drew the “rumours” and quotes the numerous “it was saids” in his letter.

But what Greg does not know, or pretends not to know, is that one of such “confidants” actually clearly mentions his name and that of his doctor in relation to doping events.

- It is absolutely false that cyclists contacted me for doping programs: some came to me at first with such request, but never came back twice.

Bruyneel Acknowledges That Discovery Bikes Were Sold On EBay | Cyclingnews.com

Johan Bruyneel has confirmed that one of his past teams sold bikes, but said it was after Discovery Channel had ended its sponsorship in 2007, and that he had “no idea” where the money had gone.

Floyd Landis had claimed recently that the US Postal team sold bikes to help fund the team’s doping programme. He said that some 60 bikes were not accounted for, and that they had been sold for cash.

“What Floyd is saying is that 60 bikes were missing,” Bruyneel said to the AP. “I have absolutely no idea where he got that from.”

Filed under Armstrong, Bruyneel, doping, Landis, LeMond by Rob.
Why confess after so much effort was expended on denials? Why implicate just about everyone he has ever ridden with? Armstrong, Hincapie, Leipheimer… and Bruyneel of course. Is it revenge, or a need to clear his conscience? It’s an amazing co-incidence, to have Dave Z leading the ToC right now and to be named by Landis along with the all-star cast of past colleagues…. mind you, at least one of these emails reportedly date back to April 30.

Apart from the riders implicated in various forms of abuse, there is a report of money paid to silence a positive finding against Armstrong. Of course this is really nothing new, similar allegations have been made by many people – except that it’s a former team-mate saying it. Whilst these are untested allegations it does signal a major drama for the sport in the coming months.  

Report: Landis admits doping and fingers Armstrong – Yahoo! News

Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title for doping but had always denied cheating, sent a series of e-mails to cycling officials and sponsors acknowledging and detailing his long-term use of banned drugs, the newspaper said.

The report said Landis wrote in the e-mails that he started doping in 2002, his first year racing with the U.S. Postal Service team led by Armstrong.

Landis also admitted to doping in an interview with ESPN.com.

Landis also accused American riders Levi Leipheimer and Dave Zabriskie and Armstrong’s longtime coach, Johan Bruyneel, of involvement in doping, the Journal reported.

Filed under Armstrong, Bruyneel, EPO, Landis, Testosterone by Rob.
Why confess after so much effort was expended on denials? Why implicate just about everyone he has ever ridden with? Armstrong, Hincapie, Leipheimer… and Bruyneel of course. Is it revenge, or a need to clear his conscience? It’s an amazing co-incidence, to have Dave Z leading the ToC right now and to be named by Landis along with the all-star cast of past colleagues…. mind you, at least one of these emails reportedly date back to April 30.

Apart from the riders implicated in various forms of abuse, there is a report of money paid to silence a positive finding against Armstrong. Of course this is really nothing new, similar allegations have been made by many people – except that it’s a former team-mate saying it. Whilst these are untested allegations it does signal a major drama for the sport in the coming months.  

Report: Landis admits doping and fingers Armstrong – Yahoo! News

Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title for doping but had always denied cheating, sent a series of e-mails to cycling officials and sponsors acknowledging and detailing his long-term use of banned drugs, the newspaper said.

The report said Landis wrote in the e-mails that he started doping in 2002, his first year racing with the U.S. Postal Service team led by Armstrong.

Landis also admitted to doping in an interview with ESPN.com.

Landis also accused American riders Levi Leipheimer and Dave Zabriskie and Armstrong’s longtime coach, Johan Bruyneel, of involvement in doping, the Journal reported.

Filed under Armstrong, Bruyneel, EPO, Landis, Testosterone by Rob.

Bye-bye Le Tour for Astana. Unless ASO does an almighty backflip there will be no invitation this year to Le Tour de France for the Astana team and their star riders. Riders who last year secured both 1st and 3rd, may I add. With stakes so high on either side – ASO desperately wants a drug-free Tour and Astana just want to race on the biggest stage – it may be that this ban gets contested all the way to July.

CN reports: The Astana team was given a resounding vote of no confidence on Wednesday when the Tour de France organiser, Amaury Sport Organisation, announced that the team would not be invited to any of the ASO’s events. This means its star, Alberto Contador, will not be able to defend his titles in either the Tour or the upcoming Paris-Nice.

Just my opinion, but who can blame ASO? Whilst Bruyneel may claim – quite rightly – that this is a new Astana with the right attitude and tough anti-doping rules and testing in place, this is also a team that in 2007 fostered the up and down roller-coaster ride that was Vinokourov (blood doper). And Kashechkin (blood doper). And Kessler (testosterone abuser). And a team that has managed to bring into the fold the remains – both key riders and managers – of a fairly tight-knit, successful and at times questionable Discovery team. I say ‘questionable’ advisedly, however there are enough books and websites written on the subjects of Armstrong, Landis and Basso for you to gather some answers – or simply more questions – for yourself.

When you reflect on Astana’s hasty creation from the charred remains of the bloodied corpse of Liberty Seguros – and its dreadfully tarnished image since – you have to wonder if ASO can afford to risk Le Tour’s reputation once more. Obviously not, at this stage anyway.

Filed under Armstrong, Astana, Basso, Bruyneel, Contador, Kashechkin, Kessler, Landis, Liberty Seguros, Vinokourov by Rob.

Bye-bye Le Tour for Astana. Unless ASO does an almighty backflip there will be no invitation this year to Le Tour de France for the Astana team and their star riders. Riders who last year secured both 1st and 3rd, may I add. With stakes so high on either side – ASO desperately wants a drug-free Tour and Astana just want to race on the biggest stage – it may be that this ban gets contested all the way to July.

CN reports: The Astana team was given a resounding vote of no confidence on Wednesday when the Tour de France organiser, Amaury Sport Organisation, announced that the team would not be invited to any of the ASO’s events. This means its star, Alberto Contador, will not be able to defend his titles in either the Tour or the upcoming Paris-Nice.

Just my opinion, but who can blame ASO? Whilst Bruyneel may claim – quite rightly – that this is a new Astana with the right attitude and tough anti-doping rules and testing in place, this is also a team that in 2007 fostered the up and down roller-coaster ride that was Vinokourov (blood doper). And Kashechkin (blood doper). And Kessler (testosterone abuser). And a team that has managed to bring into the fold the remains – both key riders and managers – of a fairly tight-knit, successful and at times questionable Discovery team. I say ‘questionable’ advisedly, however there are enough books and websites written on the subjects of Armstrong, Landis and Basso for you to gather some answers – or simply more questions – for yourself.

When you reflect on Astana’s hasty creation from the charred remains of the bloodied corpse of Liberty Seguros – and its dreadfully tarnished image since – you have to wonder if ASO can afford to risk Le Tour’s reputation once more. Obviously not, at this stage anyway.

Filed under Armstrong, Astana, Basso, Bruyneel, Contador, Kashechkin, Kessler, Landis, Liberty Seguros, Vinokourov by Rob.

October 5, 2007

A state of general unease

Does anyone else feel uneasy about this? Is it just me? Am I just a doubter by nature?

From Cyclingnews.com:Spanish media reported Wednesday that current Tour de France winner Alberto Contador was close to signing with Astana. Along with Contador would come Johan Bruyneel in a management role. Both Bruyneel and Contador are free to find new teams effective December 31, when their current Discovery Channel team comes to an end.

Maybe it’s fate and it will all turn out for the best.

Filed under Astana, Bruyneel, Contador, Discovery by Rob.

Does anyone else feel uneasy about this? Is it just me? Am I just a doubter by nature?

From Cyclingnews.com:Spanish media reported Wednesday that current Tour de France winner Alberto Contador was close to signing with Astana. Along with Contador would come Johan Bruyneel in a management role. Both Bruyneel and Contador are free to find new teams effective December 31, when their current Discovery Channel team comes to an end.

Maybe it’s fate and it will all turn out for the best.

Filed under Astana, Bruyneel, Contador, Discovery by Rob.

If Le Tour was a win for Disco and Contador it still left some bad tastes in many mouths… and for Disco’s win to be followed by the sponsorship pullout and total disbandment of the team verges on… well, it’s unusual, to say the least. And Bruyneel himself moving to the trouble-plagued Astana outfit? Possibly with Contador? Does anyone feel uneasy at all, whether justified or not?

Johan Bruyneel had some interesting things to say to CN here: Johan Bruyneel accompanies his star rider Alberto Contador to the USA for the Discovery Channel team’s final race this weekend, the Tour of Missouri, bringing the Tour de France champion and a tinge of bitterness along for the end of an era. After eight years directing the organisation which was more successful than any team in modern memory, Bruyneel has eight Tour de France victories to remember but leaves with a bad taste in his mouth. Bruyneel became familiar with the whispers of doping which follow every modern Tour winner, having stood by Lance Armstrong as he fended off one doping accusation after another through press releases and lawsuits, but this year’s Tour was too much.”They have not let me enjoy Contador’s victory in the Tour,” the Belgian told Marca, complaining of the accusations of involvement with Operación Puerto which followed the Spaniard’s victory. “With that atmosphere, it has been the worse Tour of my life,” Bruyneel lamented. Not one month after the end of the Tour, the team’s owner, Tailwind Sports, announced it would end its bid for a new title sponsor, effectively disbanding the organisation. Bruyneel hastily announced his retirement along with the news. He blamed the atmosphere surrounding Contador’s win for his decision. “All of that was the main reasons why I did not desire to continue.

Filed under Astana, Bruyneel, Contador, Discovery by Rob.

If Le Tour was a win for Disco and Contador it still left some bad tastes in many mouths… and for Disco’s win to be followed by the sponsorship pullout and total disbandment of the team verges on… well, it’s unusual, to say the least. And Bruyneel himself moving to the trouble-plagued Astana outfit? Possibly with Contador? Does anyone feel uneasy at all, whether justified or not?

Johan Bruyneel had some interesting things to say to CN here: Johan Bruyneel accompanies his star rider Alberto Contador to the USA for the Discovery Channel team’s final race this weekend, the Tour of Missouri, bringing the Tour de France champion and a tinge of bitterness along for the end of an era. After eight years directing the organisation which was more successful than any team in modern memory, Bruyneel has eight Tour de France victories to remember but leaves with a bad taste in his mouth. Bruyneel became familiar with the whispers of doping which follow every modern Tour winner, having stood by Lance Armstrong as he fended off one doping accusation after another through press releases and lawsuits, but this year’s Tour was too much.”They have not let me enjoy Contador’s victory in the Tour,” the Belgian told Marca, complaining of the accusations of involvement with Operación Puerto which followed the Spaniard’s victory. “With that atmosphere, it has been the worse Tour of my life,” Bruyneel lamented. Not one month after the end of the Tour, the team’s owner, Tailwind Sports, announced it would end its bid for a new title sponsor, effectively disbanding the organisation. Bruyneel hastily announced his retirement along with the news. He blamed the atmosphere surrounding Contador’s win for his decision. “All of that was the main reasons why I did not desire to continue.

Filed under Astana, Bruyneel, Contador, Discovery by Rob.

Login

These posts represent my opinions only and may have little or no association with the "facts" as you or others see them. Look elsewhere, think, make up your own mind. If I quote someone else I attribute. If I link to a web site it's because I have visited it myself and wish to refer to it, however that linking doesn't denote, imply or suggest any ownership, agreement with or control over that content.

If an advertisement appears it's because I affiliate with Google, Amazon and others similar in nature and usually means nothing more than that... the Internet is a wild and untamed place folks, so please tread warily. My posts do not constitute consultation, advice or legal opinion of any sort.

All original material is copyright 2012 by myself, too, in accord with the Creative Commons licence below.

Creative Commons License
GTVeloce blog by Robert Russell is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License.
Based on a work at gtveloce.com.