It’s hard to think under pressure, especially when fools like me will analyse every word. English may also not be kind to Cancellara’s meaning. And he may have been misquoted. True, also, that he does have a lot at stake personally. But telling the world that he was distracted by next year’s contract during the World Road Champs and that it “played into” his performance does boggle the mind somewhat. Didn’t he win the TT? So by extension we can assume that he only thinks about next year when getting dropped in a road race? Is that what he meant?

Cancellara Set To Join Luxembourg Pro Cycling Project | Cyclingnews.com

“The most important thing is to be with the people I feel comfortable with. I need my mechanic and my soigneur. I need to be in a perfect environment. In joining an environment that I don’t know yet, I could lose one year. I thought a lot about it at the Worlds and this played into my performance,” he said.

It’s hard to think under pressure, especially when fools like me will analyse every word. English may also not be kind to Cancellara’s meaning. And he may have been misquoted. True, also, that he does have a lot at stake personally. But telling the world that he was distracted by next year’s contract during the World Road Champs and that it “played into” his performance does boggle the mind somewhat. Didn’t he win the TT? So by extension we can assume that he only thinks about next year when getting dropped in a road race? Is that what he meant?

Cancellara Set To Join Luxembourg Pro Cycling Project | Cyclingnews.com

“The most important thing is to be with the people I feel comfortable with. I need my mechanic and my soigneur. I need to be in a perfect environment. In joining an environment that I don’t know yet, I could lose one year. I thought a lot about it at the Worlds and this played into my performance,” he said.

I wasn’t there so I don’t know – but I have an opinion on the question of “fairness”. And it’s a saga that goes on and on, regrettably, without a solution. And isn’t that the way everything works these days? The tiniest detail gets pounced upon and sides are taken, black or white. If it sticks and goes viral it snowballs out of all proportion but no agreement is reached or solution offered.

Andy Schleck‘s so-called “mechanical” when he somehow “lost his chain” (when in fact it appeared to jam on his cogs, as if he’d stuffed up a gearchange) is one example, and Stage 2 into Spa is another one. And now in post-race analysis Scott Sunderland appears to be putting his (possibly biased, being an ex member of what was the CSC team) views into Thor Hushovd‘s mouth. As well as putting Contador in his place for not waiting for Andy when his chain jammed. But what exactly is “fair”? Is it so black and white?

Now on the day into Spa it appeared (on TV and in post-race interviews, anyway) that Thor Hushovd wasn’t very pleased about the bullying tactics used by Cancellara and the Saxo Bank team to annul the slippery stage. So to say that Thor wouldn’t have wanted to win like that is certainly going a bit far. If Thor has changed his mind, great – let him say that himself. 

Now in principle we probably agree that gaining time by leveraging other riders’ misfortune is not how we would like to win a race. But it assumes several things:

• Firstly that only the lucky got through unscathed, which is debatable. Wet, narrow descent with or without a crashed motorbike says “keep clear of other riders, slow down, pick your line” to me
• Secondly, a corollary to the first, that skill was not involved. Again, bike handling and the ability to pick your line is paramount
• Thirdly, that all teams played the conditions the same and were equally affected, which is not true. There was a breakaway and a chase group plus a larger group, all playing out different tactics. There are safer ways to play dangerous situations and some teams did better than others by design
• Fourthly, that an independent referee is available to assess the conditions and make an informed but unpressured and one-step-removed decision on conditions and actions to address. Which is debatable. The race referee was certainly there but his decision was visibly informed by Cancellara, who had an obvious (and conflicted) role in firstly waiting for the Schlecks and secondly in coercing other riders from other teams into a go-slow agreement.  

Now the other side to the argument is that an unusually large proportion of riders were affected and that several riders reported conditions where “everyone” went down and that even cars couldn’t stay on the road. In which case you’d think that the stage should be annulled there and then, rather than let one rider win and take yellow whilst effectively penalising anyone else who’d recovered or avoided the drama.

It’s not as if it hasn’t happened before. There was for example Le Tour in 1999 when an unusually large proportion of the field went down and lost 6 minutes or more – effectively ending the race for the overall there and then. But Armstrong isn’t likely to hand back that Tour win because he didn’t wait for Zulle, is he? Indeed his team and others actively exploited the situation. Riders are down, big fall – let’s stomp on the gas!

There’s always another side, another way to view things. In 1999 you had to get to the front. It wasn’t just luck. The same applies in 2010, or perhaps should have applied.

You could say that we must learn for these things, and so we should. But one thing to learn from 2010 is that it isn’t appropriate for race officials to appear to do a deal with the yellow jersey where obvious conflicts of interest exist. There must be a better, fairer way to deal with such situations. It isn’t necessarily easy but leaving it ‘as it is’ is inappropriate.

Oh, and jamming your chain is just one of those things that can happen when you make ham-fisted changes on the highly-tuned engineering kludges we call bicycle drivetrains.

Where The Tour Was Won | Cyclingnews.com

Sunderland: “I think the same logic should be applied to the green jersey competition. Thor Hushovd missed out on a lot of points that day but I don’t think he would have wanted to win that way.”

1999 Tour de France – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1999 edition of Tour de France had two bizarre moments. The first was on stage 2 when a 25 rider pile-up occurred at Passage du Gois. Passage du Gois is a two mile causeway which depending on the tide can be under water. The second bizarre incident was on stage 10, one kilometre from the summit of L’Alpe d’Huez. Leading Italian rider Giuseppe Guerini was confronted by a spectator holding a camera in the middle of the road. Guerini hit the spectator but recovered and went on to win the stage.

The Tour de France At A Glance – 1999

Frankie Andreu: The main difficulty in this completely flat stage was a four-kilometer causeway that crossed a huge river. It’s passable during the day with low tide and flooded during high tide. You can imagine that the causeway would be a little slick and wet by the time we arrived.

The race was calm till the first bonus sprint of the day at kilometer 30. After that the attacks started and the battle for good position for the causeway was already starting. It was still 50 kilometers till we arrived there. To make matters worse it was windy and I’m sure every team told their riders to be first into the causeway.

The battle was furious trying to keep Lance in good position to get across this causeway safely. Looking back it was a good thing we did. After the entrance to this four-kilometer causeway there was a huge crash. Guys went down everywhere. You could see riders trying to brake, but they hit the ground instantaneously. Going across the causeway was very, very scary. It was wet, slippery and windy. It felt like a risk to even turn your wheel to change directions. I was scared to ride on the edge of the road because it was too slick.

Coming out of the causeway the group had split – partially because we went fast and partly because of the huge crash. There was a front group of about 40 and immediately ONCE started riding. It took us a few kilometers to figure out why. We didn’t know there was a crash at the time and in the rear group there were a few favorites.

Right away Johan told us to go to the front and help ONCE. The reason was that in the second group were Gotti, Belli, Zülle, Boogerd, Robin, and some other favorites in the overall.

In the second group Banesto started to chase immediately. They came within 30 seconds of catching us, but we were in time-trial mode in the first group with about ten guys. It became an 80-kilometer team time trial, trying to increase the gap between the second group and us. We had five ONCE riders, two Casino, two Cofidis, and Christian and I riding full tilt all the way to the finish. We put over six minutes on the guys behind. Lance lost the jersey today to Kirsipu, who won every bonus sprint, but Lance did manage to eliminate some very strong riders for the classement.

In the race today the Spanish guys had a new nickname for Jonathon Vaughters. They called him “El Gato”, the cat. He got the name after he flew into a crash yesterday and went flying. Somehow he landed on his feet; he didn’t get a scratch on his body. The bad news is that today Jonathon lost his nickname. He was one of the unlucky ones to get caught in the crash on the causeway.

1999- The Clean Tour – RideStrong

So the Tour had an undeniably “clean” winner, though his (Armstrong’s) domination was not the unnatural performance that certain sections of the French press tried to accuse him of. Take away the stage over the Passage de Gois, and his lead over Zülle is a rather more mundane-looking 1½ minutes. And the Tour threw up several other imponderables. There were no French stage winners for the first time since 1926. The transition stages saw breaks of minor riders gain huge leads each day, with the big stars seemingly content to have four days off. Yet for all the drug-free culture, the average speed was over 40kmh for the first time ever. Even allowing for the easier route this year (and arguably it was in fact a harder route than some of those in the seventies and eighties), one is left with questions. If a drug-free peloton could ride so fast, what was the point of taking EPO in the past? And if EPO does have an effect, was 1999 really a drug-free peloton?

SBS: Tour de France 2010: Dangerous course or dangerous force?

It’s been a long time since I’ve witnessed this much carnage at the Tour de France.

The last occasion I can recall such circumstances was 11 years ago, at the 1999 Tour.

What was thought to be a relatively innocuous second stage quickly turned into a massacre, when on the Passage du Gois, a two-mile long causeway that depending on tidal conditions can be submerged in water, a 25 rider pile-up eventuated that split the field to itty bitty pieces and left Lance Armstrong’s most noted adversary, Swiss rider Alex Zülle, behind in a frantic chase that never regained contact.

Zülle along with Jan Ullrich were arguably the only two riders to really challenge the Texan during his Tour reign, and Armstrong’s 7’37” winning advantage did not really tell the full story.

I’m not saying Zülle would have beaten Armstrong in the first of his seven straight wins, but had he not crashed, the race would without doubt have played out very differently.

SBS: Tour de France 2010: Dangerous course or dangerous force?

But read this from cycling legend Eddy Merckx, who told Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf after Stage 1: “It’s part of the job. Especially in the beginning of a Grand Tour, you can not blame the organisation. It is the riders themselves who [must] bear the blame. If you do not want to brake and if you are not afraid to go for an opponent who is faster, then do not be afraid of crashing.”

In the end Monday, the Schleck brothers were saved by an entente cordiale initiated by the erstwhile maillot jaune of Fabian Cancellara, who relinquished his golden fleece to perhaps the most popular guy in France right now, Sylvain Chavanel.

Where The Tour Was Won | Cyclingnews.com

Scott Sunderland: “Contador pulled on the yellow jersey in Luchon but when he heard the crowd whistle and boo him, I’m sure he realised he’d unfairly taken advantage of Andy’s mechanical problem.”

‘I know the race was ‘on’, that everything was decided in split seconds and the other riders attacked too, but Contador was the first to go clear and kept going all the way to the finish thanks to a special ‘friendship’ with Samuel Sanchez, who guided him down the descent.”

I think he should have at least of asked the other riders to wait. I know these guys are competing against each other but there must always be room for some sportsmanship in cycling. The riders share the same road and face the same difficulties. Alberto is a special champion but missed an opportunity to show he has a special sense of fair play.”

I wasn’t there so I don’t know – but I have an opinion on the question of “fairness”. And it’s a saga that goes on and on, regrettably, without a solution. And isn’t that the way everything works these days? The tiniest detail gets pounced upon and sides are taken, black or white. If it sticks and goes viral it snowballs out of all proportion but no agreement is reached or solution offered.

Andy Schleck‘s so-called “mechanical” when he somehow “lost his chain” (when in fact it appeared to jam on his cogs, as if he’d stuffed up a gearchange) is one example, and Stage 2 into Spa is another one. And now in post-race analysis Scott Sunderland appears to be putting his (possibly biased, being an ex member of what was the CSC team) views into Thor Hushovd‘s mouth. As well as putting Contador in his place for not waiting for Andy when his chain jammed. But what exactly is “fair”? Is it so black and white?

Now on the day into Spa it appeared (on TV and in post-race interviews, anyway) that Thor Hushovd wasn’t very pleased about the bullying tactics used by Cancellara and the Saxo Bank team to annul the slippery stage. So to say that Thor wouldn’t have wanted to win like that is certainly going a bit far. If Thor has changed his mind, great – let him say that himself. 

Now in principle we probably agree that gaining time by leveraging other riders’ misfortune is not how we would like to win a race. But it assumes several things:

• Firstly that only the lucky got through unscathed, which is debatable. Wet, narrow descent with or without a crashed motorbike says “keep clear of other riders, slow down, pick your line” to me
• Secondly, a corollary to the first, that skill was not involved. Again, bike handling and the ability to pick your line is paramount
• Thirdly, that all teams played the conditions the same and were equally affected, which is not true. There was a breakaway and a chase group plus a larger group, all playing out different tactics. There are safer ways to play dangerous situations and some teams did better than others by design
• Fourthly, that an independent referee is available to assess the conditions and make an informed but unpressured and one-step-removed decision on conditions and actions to address. Which is debatable. The race referee was certainly there but his decision was visibly informed by Cancellara, who had an obvious (and conflicted) role in firstly waiting for the Schlecks and secondly in coercing other riders from other teams into a go-slow agreement.  

Now the other side to the argument is that an unusually large proportion of riders were affected and that several riders reported conditions where “everyone” went down and that even cars couldn’t stay on the road. In which case you’d think that the stage should be annulled there and then, rather than let one rider win and take yellow whilst effectively penalising anyone else who’d recovered or avoided the drama.

It’s not as if it hasn’t happened before. There was for example Le Tour in 1999 when an unusually large proportion of the field went down and lost 6 minutes or more – effectively ending the race for the overall there and then. But Armstrong isn’t likely to hand back that Tour win because he didn’t wait for Zulle, is he? Indeed his team and others actively exploited the situation. Riders are down, big fall – let’s stomp on the gas!

There’s always another side, another way to view things. In 1999 you had to get to the front. It wasn’t just luck. The same applies in 2010, or perhaps should have applied.

You could say that we must learn for these things, and so we should. But one thing to learn from 2010 is that it isn’t appropriate for race officials to appear to do a deal with the yellow jersey where obvious conflicts of interest exist. There must be a better, fairer way to deal with such situations. It isn’t necessarily easy but leaving it ‘as it is’ is inappropriate.

Oh, and jamming your chain is just one of those things that can happen when you make ham-fisted changes on the highly-tuned engineering kludges we call bicycle drivetrains.

Where The Tour Was Won | Cyclingnews.com

Sunderland: “I think the same logic should be applied to the green jersey competition. Thor Hushovd missed out on a lot of points that day but I don’t think he would have wanted to win that way.”

1999 Tour de France – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1999 edition of Tour de France had two bizarre moments. The first was on stage 2 when a 25 rider pile-up occurred at Passage du Gois. Passage du Gois is a two mile causeway which depending on the tide can be under water. The second bizarre incident was on stage 10, one kilometre from the summit of L’Alpe d’Huez. Leading Italian rider Giuseppe Guerini was confronted by a spectator holding a camera in the middle of the road. Guerini hit the spectator but recovered and went on to win the stage.

The Tour de France At A Glance – 1999

Frankie Andreu: The main difficulty in this completely flat stage was a four-kilometer causeway that crossed a huge river. It’s passable during the day with low tide and flooded during high tide. You can imagine that the causeway would be a little slick and wet by the time we arrived.

The race was calm till the first bonus sprint of the day at kilometer 30. After that the attacks started and the battle for good position for the causeway was already starting. It was still 50 kilometers till we arrived there. To make matters worse it was windy and I’m sure every team told their riders to be first into the causeway.

The battle was furious trying to keep Lance in good position to get across this causeway safely. Looking back it was a good thing we did. After the entrance to this four-kilometer causeway there was a huge crash. Guys went down everywhere. You could see riders trying to brake, but they hit the ground instantaneously. Going across the causeway was very, very scary. It was wet, slippery and windy. It felt like a risk to even turn your wheel to change directions. I was scared to ride on the edge of the road because it was too slick.

Coming out of the causeway the group had split – partially because we went fast and partly because of the huge crash. There was a front group of about 40 and immediately ONCE started riding. It took us a few kilometers to figure out why. We didn’t know there was a crash at the time and in the rear group there were a few favorites.

Right away Johan told us to go to the front and help ONCE. The reason was that in the second group were Gotti, Belli, Zülle, Boogerd, Robin, and some other favorites in the overall.

In the second group Banesto started to chase immediately. They came within 30 seconds of catching us, but we were in time-trial mode in the first group with about ten guys. It became an 80-kilometer team time trial, trying to increase the gap between the second group and us. We had five ONCE riders, two Casino, two Cofidis, and Christian and I riding full tilt all the way to the finish. We put over six minutes on the guys behind. Lance lost the jersey today to Kirsipu, who won every bonus sprint, but Lance did manage to eliminate some very strong riders for the classement.

In the race today the Spanish guys had a new nickname for Jonathon Vaughters. They called him “El Gato”, the cat. He got the name after he flew into a crash yesterday and went flying. Somehow he landed on his feet; he didn’t get a scratch on his body. The bad news is that today Jonathon lost his nickname. He was one of the unlucky ones to get caught in the crash on the causeway.

1999- The Clean Tour – RideStrong

So the Tour had an undeniably “clean” winner, though his (Armstrong’s) domination was not the unnatural performance that certain sections of the French press tried to accuse him of. Take away the stage over the Passage de Gois, and his lead over Zülle is a rather more mundane-looking 1½ minutes. And the Tour threw up several other imponderables. There were no French stage winners for the first time since 1926. The transition stages saw breaks of minor riders gain huge leads each day, with the big stars seemingly content to have four days off. Yet for all the drug-free culture, the average speed was over 40kmh for the first time ever. Even allowing for the easier route this year (and arguably it was in fact a harder route than some of those in the seventies and eighties), one is left with questions. If a drug-free peloton could ride so fast, what was the point of taking EPO in the past? And if EPO does have an effect, was 1999 really a drug-free peloton?

SBS: Tour de France 2010: Dangerous course or dangerous force?

It’s been a long time since I’ve witnessed this much carnage at the Tour de France.

The last occasion I can recall such circumstances was 11 years ago, at the 1999 Tour.

What was thought to be a relatively innocuous second stage quickly turned into a massacre, when on the Passage du Gois, a two-mile long causeway that depending on tidal conditions can be submerged in water, a 25 rider pile-up eventuated that split the field to itty bitty pieces and left Lance Armstrong’s most noted adversary, Swiss rider Alex Zülle, behind in a frantic chase that never regained contact.

Zülle along with Jan Ullrich were arguably the only two riders to really challenge the Texan during his Tour reign, and Armstrong’s 7’37” winning advantage did not really tell the full story.

I’m not saying Zülle would have beaten Armstrong in the first of his seven straight wins, but had he not crashed, the race would without doubt have played out very differently.

SBS: Tour de France 2010: Dangerous course or dangerous force?

But read this from cycling legend Eddy Merckx, who told Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf after Stage 1: “It’s part of the job. Especially in the beginning of a Grand Tour, you can not blame the organisation. It is the riders themselves who [must] bear the blame. If you do not want to brake and if you are not afraid to go for an opponent who is faster, then do not be afraid of crashing.”

In the end Monday, the Schleck brothers were saved by an entente cordiale initiated by the erstwhile maillot jaune of Fabian Cancellara, who relinquished his golden fleece to perhaps the most popular guy in France right now, Sylvain Chavanel.

Where The Tour Was Won | Cyclingnews.com

Scott Sunderland: “Contador pulled on the yellow jersey in Luchon but when he heard the crowd whistle and boo him, I’m sure he realised he’d unfairly taken advantage of Andy’s mechanical problem.”

‘I know the race was ‘on’, that everything was decided in split seconds and the other riders attacked too, but Contador was the first to go clear and kept going all the way to the finish thanks to a special ‘friendship’ with Samuel Sanchez, who guided him down the descent.”

I think he should have at least of asked the other riders to wait. I know these guys are competing against each other but there must always be room for some sportsmanship in cycling. The riders share the same road and face the same difficulties. Alberto is a special champion but missed an opportunity to show he has a special sense of fair play.”

Forget the private race between friends Alberto and Andy, it was Menchov and Hesjedal that made the running. The usual Phil and Paul TV commentary was appalling and made it all sound more exciting than the fizzer it really was. But that’s showbiz and the game we are playing these days. If you want to make money, make it dramatic – be it politics or sport, it all comes down to the artificial: the soap-operatic drama of it all. Thus we get the endless inquisition on the so-called “mechanical” and now how the race – a 3 week race, mind – was “really” lost on day 1 (the prologue, I mean) because of a wet road for Andy.

Perhaps we should hold Le Tour inside on single-speed bikes under controlled conditions to save ourselves from sloppy gearchangers and the vagaries of weather?   

OTOH just imagine the race we may have had if Cancellara hadn’t annulled stage 2. Imagine if Andy Schleck was left holding his arm on the side of the road, waiting for a new bike – and was significantly gapped by a host of riders. Imagine if Hushovd and McEwen had got a significant swag of points instead of nothing. Just imagine. And unlike the hamfisted “mechanical” or the state of the weather it was Andy’s teammate Fabian who changed the direction of the whole race. We shouldn’t worry about the little details, it’s the bigger fish we have to fry instead.   

Contador Elated But Admits He Struggled | Cyclingnews.com

“The truth is there’s a lot of emotion. I think it’s the first Tour to give me this much emotion. You can’t imagine how much I’ve given. Yes, there were few days when I wasn’t in my best form, and that might be why I’m so emotional.”

“The last year has been difficult for all kinds of reasons,” the Spaniard said. “This year I’ve not been at my best all the time and that was the case today. But of course in the end I’m very happy with how the year has now turned out. All the victories this year have been the result of a lot of hard work. It’s been said that I’ve not competed in a lot of races but I’ve spent a lot of time away from home preparing for this objective.”

Contador Elated But Admits He Struggled | Cyclingnews.com

“But this year I’ve not been in my best shape. Today I didn’t feel too well. I didn’t sleep well and woke up with stomach ache, but ultimately the day turned out pretty well for me, although I suffered more today than at any other time this year.”

He would not be drawn on how far he was below his best or what his worst days had been. “I can’t really say what percentage I was below my best, but there were some moments that I had the same good sensations as last year. I wasn’t at the same level as last year, but I still managed to win. I won’t say which my bad days were. I’ll keep that to myself for obvious reasons.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

The wind makes Denis Menchov’s ride all the more impressive. He was the fourth from final rider to leave the start house and he managed to finish 11th in the time trial and take two minutes out of Sammy Sanchez. He was the top-placed rider of anyone in the top 10 overall, and his performance moved him ahead of Sanchez and into third place overall. For years, Menchov has been talked about as a potential Tour de France winner, but in each of his previous attempts at the race he’s cracked and fallen out of contention. This year he quietly rode a nearly-perfect race. He wasn’t able to stay with Andy Schleck or Alberto Contador in the mountains, but with the 2009 Giro d’Italia victory in his back pocket and a really strong performance in this year’s Tour de France, he could very well return to the Tour in 2011 as a very serious contender for the overall victory. This would be especially true if the 2011 edition of the race has two long individual time trials and/or a team time trial.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

There’s also no doubt that the chance to take the yellow jersey off Contador’s back today provided immense motivation, perhaps more so than last year when the two riders entered the final time trial separated by 2:26 (a gap Schleck knew to be unassailable).

But I have a hunch that Schleck’s result today was not an anomaly. I don’t think he pulled a once-in-a-lifetime effort out of his body today, but that he’s significantly narrowed the gap between himself and Alberto Contador in terms of time trials. And if Andy Schleck continues to improve in the mountains (he and Contador were equals in the mountains this year, where Contador could accelerate away from him last year) and in the time trials, he could very well beat Contador in the 2011 Tour de France.

Tour De France: Stage 19, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

“I did the first 40km really, really fast,” said Schleck. “I lost more in the final 10 kilometres than in the rest but I fought to the end.”

The Luxembourger accepted his defeat, even more so because it did not come down to the mechanical. When asked about the 42 seconds he conceded to the Spaniard on the Tour’s very first day, three weeks ago, Schleck said, “The prologue was terrible for me but it’s part of the Tour de France. I haven’t got any regrets. Anything can happen in the Tour. I know that. I’m satisfied and I’ll be back next year to try and win,” he said.

Tour De France: Stage 19, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

Menchov will thus be the third man to feature on the famed podium on the Champs-Elysées Sunday evening, with the rest of the top ten classification unchanged except for Ryder Hesjedal (Garmin-Transitions), who moved up from eighth to seventh: an excellent performance for the 29-year-old Canadian.

Tour de France Stage 19

Garmin team rider Johan Van Summeren of Belgium falls at the start of the individual time-trial. Photo: Reuters

Hesjedal into 7th overall, DZ takes 5th on day – Tour de France, stage 19 – Team Garmin-Transitions

Hesjedal’s amazing run up the overall began after the crash-marred stage 2 that saw Christian Vande Velde abandon.

“On the morning of stage 3, Matt White said, ‘It’s open, give it the best you can.’ I didn’t wait around,” he told Velonews’ Neal Rogers.

“I went for it, and I wanted to keep that going the whole race. I didn’t want to be high in the standings and fade away through the Tour de France. I wanted to stay up there.”

“I’ve always believed I was capable, and here I am now.”

addicted2wheels

I guess yesterday’s – or last night’s – debacle at Le Tour can be blamed on too many riders on too-narrow roads. Add some rain and maybe a sprinkle of oil and bingo, they all fall down. Well, some had better luck than others. Chavanal made his own luck and kept well clear, making his win a deserved one – but the points and time gap were not a “real” result and I’m sure even he feels a bit cheated that the remaining riders – and not just Cancellara, although he spontaneously took up the ‘lead coordinator’ role – turned off the chase. Yes, it was the right thing to do when big names were splattered all over the road – it’s meant to be an athletic contest, not a smash-em-up derby after all. But many of us have been in bike races where conditions were bad – rain, hail, dirt roads, crashes – and still the race went on. So why last night was different I’m not sure. It was bad and riders were confused, but did it need to be neutralised all the way to the end…? What if Cancellara and others were not just seeking to be “fair” to the fallen but also hoping that their teammates made it back, too?

Phil (Anderson) was also asked about Cancellara’s ‘control’ of the “risk” on the stage won by Chavenal, at the expense of those who had suffered and clawed their way back to the front in search of points (like McEwen and Hushovd). Rightly, Phil pointed out the obvious conflict of interest in a rider seemingly annulling a stage (his teammate Andy Shleck had been gapped for example) and pointedly called Cancellara a “bully”. Well Fabian may actually be a very nice guy (Scott Sunderland said so earlier this week so it’s probably true) but he certainly displayed a degree of self-assured “Tour Patron” aura not seen since Lance was the Boss. Or maybe not since Hinault last pulled on the yellow jersey and gave the peleton a piece of his mind.

OTOH there’s money on the line here and decisions were made on the road by individuals with a vested interest in the final result. Now if the riders were not connected by radio to team directors I’d be less inclined to question their motivations, but in any event it was obvious that neutralising the stage was in the best interests of several teams – and perhaps the majority. And the minority who were coerced into following what the Saxo Bank team wanted could do nothing. Oh sure, they could’ve attacked when the main field regrouped but they would also have been chased down by the man with the yellow jersey on his back and given at least some sort of tongue-lashing, or worse.

Forget the private race between friends Alberto and Andy, it was Menchov and Hesjedal that made the running. The usual Phil and Paul TV commentary was appalling and made it all sound more exciting than the fizzer it really was. But that’s showbiz and the game we are playing these days. If you want to make money, make it dramatic – be it politics or sport, it all comes down to the artificial: the soap-operatic drama of it all. Thus we get the endless inquisition on the so-called “mechanical” and now how the race – a 3 week race, mind – was “really” lost on day 1 (the prologue, I mean) because of a wet road for Andy.

Perhaps we should hold Le Tour inside on single-speed bikes under controlled conditions to save ourselves from sloppy gearchangers and the vagaries of weather?   

OTOH just imagine the race we may have had if Cancellara hadn’t annulled stage 2. Imagine if Andy Schleck was left holding his arm on the side of the road, waiting for a new bike – and was significantly gapped by a host of riders. Imagine if Hushovd and McEwen had got a significant swag of points instead of nothing. Just imagine. And unlike the hamfisted “mechanical” or the state of the weather it was Andy’s teammate Fabian who changed the direction of the whole race. We shouldn’t worry about the little details, it’s the bigger fish we have to fry instead.   

Contador Elated But Admits He Struggled | Cyclingnews.com

“The truth is there’s a lot of emotion. I think it’s the first Tour to give me this much emotion. You can’t imagine how much I’ve given. Yes, there were few days when I wasn’t in my best form, and that might be why I’m so emotional.”

“The last year has been difficult for all kinds of reasons,” the Spaniard said. “This year I’ve not been at my best all the time and that was the case today. But of course in the end I’m very happy with how the year has now turned out. All the victories this year have been the result of a lot of hard work. It’s been said that I’ve not competed in a lot of races but I’ve spent a lot of time away from home preparing for this objective.”

Contador Elated But Admits He Struggled | Cyclingnews.com

“But this year I’ve not been in my best shape. Today I didn’t feel too well. I didn’t sleep well and woke up with stomach ache, but ultimately the day turned out pretty well for me, although I suffered more today than at any other time this year.”

He would not be drawn on how far he was below his best or what his worst days had been. “I can’t really say what percentage I was below my best, but there were some moments that I had the same good sensations as last year. I wasn’t at the same level as last year, but I still managed to win. I won’t say which my bad days were. I’ll keep that to myself for obvious reasons.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

The wind makes Denis Menchov’s ride all the more impressive. He was the fourth from final rider to leave the start house and he managed to finish 11th in the time trial and take two minutes out of Sammy Sanchez. He was the top-placed rider of anyone in the top 10 overall, and his performance moved him ahead of Sanchez and into third place overall. For years, Menchov has been talked about as a potential Tour de France winner, but in each of his previous attempts at the race he’s cracked and fallen out of contention. This year he quietly rode a nearly-perfect race. He wasn’t able to stay with Andy Schleck or Alberto Contador in the mountains, but with the 2009 Giro d’Italia victory in his back pocket and a really strong performance in this year’s Tour de France, he could very well return to the Tour in 2011 as a very serious contender for the overall victory. This would be especially true if the 2011 edition of the race has two long individual time trials and/or a team time trial.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

There’s also no doubt that the chance to take the yellow jersey off Contador’s back today provided immense motivation, perhaps more so than last year when the two riders entered the final time trial separated by 2:26 (a gap Schleck knew to be unassailable).

But I have a hunch that Schleck’s result today was not an anomaly. I don’t think he pulled a once-in-a-lifetime effort out of his body today, but that he’s significantly narrowed the gap between himself and Alberto Contador in terms of time trials. And if Andy Schleck continues to improve in the mountains (he and Contador were equals in the mountains this year, where Contador could accelerate away from him last year) and in the time trials, he could very well beat Contador in the 2011 Tour de France.

Tour De France: Stage 19, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

“I did the first 40km really, really fast,” said Schleck. “I lost more in the final 10 kilometres than in the rest but I fought to the end.”

The Luxembourger accepted his defeat, even more so because it did not come down to the mechanical. When asked about the 42 seconds he conceded to the Spaniard on the Tour’s very first day, three weeks ago, Schleck said, “The prologue was terrible for me but it’s part of the Tour de France. I haven’t got any regrets. Anything can happen in the Tour. I know that. I’m satisfied and I’ll be back next year to try and win,” he said.

Tour De France: Stage 19, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

Menchov will thus be the third man to feature on the famed podium on the Champs-Elysées Sunday evening, with the rest of the top ten classification unchanged except for Ryder Hesjedal (Garmin-Transitions), who moved up from eighth to seventh: an excellent performance for the 29-year-old Canadian.

Tour de France Stage 19

Garmin team rider Johan Van Summeren of Belgium falls at the start of the individual time-trial. Photo: Reuters

Hesjedal into 7th overall, DZ takes 5th on day – Tour de France, stage 19 – Team Garmin-Transitions

Hesjedal’s amazing run up the overall began after the crash-marred stage 2 that saw Christian Vande Velde abandon.

“On the morning of stage 3, Matt White said, ‘It’s open, give it the best you can.’ I didn’t wait around,” he told Velonews’ Neal Rogers.

“I went for it, and I wanted to keep that going the whole race. I didn’t want to be high in the standings and fade away through the Tour de France. I wanted to stay up there.”

“I’ve always believed I was capable, and here I am now.”

addicted2wheels

I guess yesterday’s – or last night’s – debacle at Le Tour can be blamed on too many riders on too-narrow roads. Add some rain and maybe a sprinkle of oil and bingo, they all fall down. Well, some had better luck than others. Chavanal made his own luck and kept well clear, making his win a deserved one – but the points and time gap were not a “real” result and I’m sure even he feels a bit cheated that the remaining riders – and not just Cancellara, although he spontaneously took up the ‘lead coordinator’ role – turned off the chase. Yes, it was the right thing to do when big names were splattered all over the road – it’s meant to be an athletic contest, not a smash-em-up derby after all. But many of us have been in bike races where conditions were bad – rain, hail, dirt roads, crashes – and still the race went on. So why last night was different I’m not sure. It was bad and riders were confused, but did it need to be neutralised all the way to the end…? What if Cancellara and others were not just seeking to be “fair” to the fallen but also hoping that their teammates made it back, too?

Phil (Anderson) was also asked about Cancellara’s ‘control’ of the “risk” on the stage won by Chavenal, at the expense of those who had suffered and clawed their way back to the front in search of points (like McEwen and Hushovd). Rightly, Phil pointed out the obvious conflict of interest in a rider seemingly annulling a stage (his teammate Andy Shleck had been gapped for example) and pointedly called Cancellara a “bully”. Well Fabian may actually be a very nice guy (Scott Sunderland said so earlier this week so it’s probably true) but he certainly displayed a degree of self-assured “Tour Patron” aura not seen since Lance was the Boss. Or maybe not since Hinault last pulled on the yellow jersey and gave the peleton a piece of his mind.

OTOH there’s money on the line here and decisions were made on the road by individuals with a vested interest in the final result. Now if the riders were not connected by radio to team directors I’d be less inclined to question their motivations, but in any event it was obvious that neutralising the stage was in the best interests of several teams – and perhaps the majority. And the minority who were coerced into following what the Saxo Bank team wanted could do nothing. Oh sure, they could’ve attacked when the main field regrouped but they would also have been chased down by the man with the yellow jersey on his back and given at least some sort of tongue-lashing, or worse.

No so surprisingly Sylvain Chavanel had something to prove after that slightly hollow win a few days ago. And equally fittingly the main agitator for that earlier non-race – Cancellara – was spat out he back.

For the rest it was a bit of a sorting out, a prelude for tougher days ahead, but told us nothing really. We expected Cancellara and Saxo Bank to rest up, there was no need to defend the yellow on Stage 7 – but every reason to prepare to launch Andy Schleck in the mountains to come. Evans equally didn’t want yellow just yet. And the domestiques of the GC leaders had a quiet day in expectation of the real battle to come in Stage 8.

A small surprise was Kloden‘s failure to match the GC leaders, but he hasn’t lived up to expectations for some years, has he? He will be back – rehydrated – and up to the task of helping launch Armstrong‘s attack. It’s just up to the others to match Armstrong, to keep him in check and leverage any opportunity that subsequently comes along. Basso and Sastre will also want to join in, even if it’s too early in the tour to commit everything they, like Armstrong, will be keen to reduce the gap to everyone else. 

Contador will also look to gain time on Schleck and Evans if that chance comes up. He may well launch Vino as a distraction… with Vino up the road Contador and Astana will hope to draw out the real GC favorites. It will put Menchov, Rogers and Wiggins to the test as well. 

And then there could be the odd surprise… Hesjedal? Roche? Van Den Broeck?

Tour De France: Stage 7, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

Sylvain Chavanel (Quick Step) won his second stage of this year’s Tour de France at Station des Rousses on Saturday, and completed another double, taking over the yellow jersey, just as he also did in Spa at the end of stage 2.

Unlike in Spa, however, the history books will show no asterisk against Chavanel’s name after this victory – which, again, he achieved alone.

Tour De France: Stage 7, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

But while the Croix de la Serra acted as the launchpad to Chavanel’s victory, and effectively ended Fabian Cancellara’s (Saxo Bank) spell in yellow, it told us very little about the climbing form of Alberto Contador (Astana), Andy Schleck (Saxo Bank), Lance Armstrong (RadioShack) or Bradley Wiggins (Team Sky), with last year’s top four all present, correct and looking comfortable.

Armstrong Keeps His Cool Despite Heat, Saddle Sore | Cyclingnews.com

“I suffered,” said Armstrong. “I think about everybody did. It was so incredibly hard. It was just the heat. Everybody really paid. Everybody would say it was much harder than we’d think because of the temperature. If you get a little behind on hydration and nutrition – that’s what happened to Klödi (Andreas Klöden) – the man with the hammer comes and you’re done.”

Leipheimer Keeps An Eye On Vinokourov | Cyclingnews.com

Levi Leipheimer’s task during stage 7 of the Tour de France was to mark Alexander Vinokourov (Astana). The RadioShack rider, who finished alongside Vinokourov in the lead group of GC contenders, said that the Astana rider was too dangerous to escape without company from someone on Lance Armstrong’s Radioshack squad.

Van Den Broeck Ready For Battle In The Alps | Cyclingnews.com

“Today went well,” he told Cyclingnews as he warmed down on the team bus. “It was an easy day with no problems but tomorrow will be all out war.”

Van Den Broeck Ready For Battle In The Alps | Cyclingnews.com

In Matthew Lloyd, Van Den Broeck has a strong mountain domestique and the Australian is sure that his teammate can make a serious impression on the race over the coming two weeks. “Today we made sure Jurgen was fresh all day, especially when the speed was relatively high.”

Roche Passes First Mountain Test | Cyclingnews.com

“I passed the test but I’m exhausted,” Roche told Cyclingnews as he ground to a halt after the finish line.

After downing a bottle of water, the 26-year-old looked up and gave his impression on day that saw all the yellow jersey contenders finish together.

“I was feeling good but I guess there was a big group at the finish. It just proves that it’s going to be pretty tough to stay with these guys,” Roche told Cyclingnews.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

when BBox Telecom missed the breakaway today, their team manager sent them to the front to chase. That brought the breakaway close enough to the peloton for French National Champion Thomas Voeckler to attack for a possible stage win.

- By Chris Carmichael -

Not to be outdone by his countryman, Sylvain Chavanel (winner of Stage 2) set off in pursuit. Chavanel had a great ride and won the stage, and took the yellow jersey for the second time in this year’s race, but the Battle of the Frenchmen – along with the heat – also made the stage much more difficult than many riders had anticipated.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

If the lead group of yellow jersey contenders is all together at the bottom of the final climb, I fully expect Alberto Contador to attack on the final climb of Stage 8. Right now there are too many riders who are close to him on the overall classification and he’ll take the opportunity to ‘thin the herd’. The big question is how well the others will respond. Cadel Evans is better than he was in 2009, and so is Lance Armstrong. Andy Schleck was the only man capable of accelerating with Contador last year, but his pre-Tour preparation wasn’t as perfect as in 2009. And what of the dark horse in the periphery, Ivan Basso. He’s looking to make up some serious time in the overall race for yellow, and the mountains are where he overcame a big deficit to win the Giro d’Italia earlier this year.

Robbie McEwen (mcewenrobbie) on Twitter

@bdlancaster i was swearing at you for going so quick but thanks mate. expected bigger time cut. was too delerious to work it out

really had to battle thru tday, world of hurt as they say, but made it. v sorry 4 my team+roommate StijnVdb, outside time limit.

Cadel’s Diary | Cadel Evans 2009-2010 – The Official Site of Cadel Evans – World Champion 2009, Tour de France runner-up in 2007,2008.

Why is it the roads always melt in Europe? More hot-mix less blue-metal?…feels like riding on underinflated tyres. So much so, that the GC teams did not want to lay it on the line today. Allowing break away specialist Chavanel to win the stage and reclaim the yellow jersey. It’s been a great start to the Tour for Quick-Step so far, they were not in the greatest moods with the omission if Tom Boonen. Carlos Barredo gave them all a moral boost yesterday, you have all seen the post stage ‘fight’ on YouTube? Our dinner table was entertained…. How he got away with only 400CHF in fines mystifies me.

No so surprisingly Sylvain Chavanel had something to prove after that slightly hollow win a few days ago. And equally fittingly the main agitator for that earlier non-race – Cancellara – was spat out he back.

For the rest it was a bit of a sorting out, a prelude for tougher days ahead, but told us nothing really. We expected Cancellara and Saxo Bank to rest up, there was no need to defend the yellow on Stage 7 – but every reason to prepare to launch Andy Schleck in the mountains to come. Evans equally didn’t want yellow just yet. And the domestiques of the GC leaders had a quiet day in expectation of the real battle to come in Stage 8.

A small surprise was Kloden‘s failure to match the GC leaders, but he hasn’t lived up to expectations for some years, has he? He will be back – rehydrated – and up to the task of helping launch Armstrong‘s attack. It’s just up to the others to match Armstrong, to keep him in check and leverage any opportunity that subsequently comes along. Basso and Sastre will also want to join in, even if it’s too early in the tour to commit everything they, like Armstrong, will be keen to reduce the gap to everyone else. 

Contador will also look to gain time on Schleck and Evans if that chance comes up. He may well launch Vino as a distraction… with Vino up the road Contador and Astana will hope to draw out the real GC favorites. It will put Menchov, Rogers and Wiggins to the test as well. 

And then there could be the odd surprise… Hesjedal? Roche? Van Den Broeck?

Tour De France: Stage 7, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

Sylvain Chavanel (Quick Step) won his second stage of this year’s Tour de France at Station des Rousses on Saturday, and completed another double, taking over the yellow jersey, just as he also did in Spa at the end of stage 2.

Unlike in Spa, however, the history books will show no asterisk against Chavanel’s name after this victory – which, again, he achieved alone.

Tour De France: Stage 7, Route Maps & Results | Cyclingnews.com

But while the Croix de la Serra acted as the launchpad to Chavanel’s victory, and effectively ended Fabian Cancellara’s (Saxo Bank) spell in yellow, it told us very little about the climbing form of Alberto Contador (Astana), Andy Schleck (Saxo Bank), Lance Armstrong (RadioShack) or Bradley Wiggins (Team Sky), with last year’s top four all present, correct and looking comfortable.

Armstrong Keeps His Cool Despite Heat, Saddle Sore | Cyclingnews.com

“I suffered,” said Armstrong. “I think about everybody did. It was so incredibly hard. It was just the heat. Everybody really paid. Everybody would say it was much harder than we’d think because of the temperature. If you get a little behind on hydration and nutrition – that’s what happened to Klödi (Andreas Klöden) – the man with the hammer comes and you’re done.”

Leipheimer Keeps An Eye On Vinokourov | Cyclingnews.com

Levi Leipheimer’s task during stage 7 of the Tour de France was to mark Alexander Vinokourov (Astana). The RadioShack rider, who finished alongside Vinokourov in the lead group of GC contenders, said that the Astana rider was too dangerous to escape without company from someone on Lance Armstrong’s Radioshack squad.

Van Den Broeck Ready For Battle In The Alps | Cyclingnews.com

“Today went well,” he told Cyclingnews as he warmed down on the team bus. “It was an easy day with no problems but tomorrow will be all out war.”

Van Den Broeck Ready For Battle In The Alps | Cyclingnews.com

In Matthew Lloyd, Van Den Broeck has a strong mountain domestique and the Australian is sure that his teammate can make a serious impression on the race over the coming two weeks. “Today we made sure Jurgen was fresh all day, especially when the speed was relatively high.”

Roche Passes First Mountain Test | Cyclingnews.com

“I passed the test but I’m exhausted,” Roche told Cyclingnews as he ground to a halt after the finish line.

After downing a bottle of water, the 26-year-old looked up and gave his impression on day that saw all the yellow jersey contenders finish together.

“I was feeling good but I guess there was a big group at the finish. It just proves that it’s going to be pretty tough to stay with these guys,” Roche told Cyclingnews.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

when BBox Telecom missed the breakaway today, their team manager sent them to the front to chase. That brought the breakaway close enough to the peloton for French National Champion Thomas Voeckler to attack for a possible stage win.

- By Chris Carmichael -

Not to be outdone by his countryman, Sylvain Chavanel (winner of Stage 2) set off in pursuit. Chavanel had a great ride and won the stage, and took the yellow jersey for the second time in this year’s race, but the Battle of the Frenchmen – along with the heat – also made the stage much more difficult than many riders had anticipated.

PezCycling News – What’s Cool In Pro Cycling

If the lead group of yellow jersey contenders is all together at the bottom of the final climb, I fully expect Alberto Contador to attack on the final climb of Stage 8. Right now there are too many riders who are close to him on the overall classification and he’ll take the opportunity to ‘thin the herd’. The big question is how well the others will respond. Cadel Evans is better than he was in 2009, and so is Lance Armstrong. Andy Schleck was the only man capable of accelerating with Contador last year, but his pre-Tour preparation wasn’t as perfect as in 2009. And what of the dark horse in the periphery, Ivan Basso. He’s looking to make up some serious time in the overall race for yellow, and the mountains are where he overcame a big deficit to win the Giro d’Italia earlier this year.

Robbie McEwen (mcewenrobbie) on Twitter

@bdlancaster i was swearing at you for going so quick but thanks mate. expected bigger time cut. was too delerious to work it out

really had to battle thru tday, world of hurt as they say, but made it. v sorry 4 my team+roommate StijnVdb, outside time limit.

Cadel’s Diary | Cadel Evans 2009-2010 – The Official Site of Cadel Evans – World Champion 2009, Tour de France runner-up in 2007,2008.

Why is it the roads always melt in Europe? More hot-mix less blue-metal?…feels like riding on underinflated tyres. So much so, that the GC teams did not want to lay it on the line today. Allowing break away specialist Chavanel to win the stage and reclaim the yellow jersey. It’s been a great start to the Tour for Quick-Step so far, they were not in the greatest moods with the omission if Tom Boonen. Carlos Barredo gave them all a moral boost yesterday, you have all seen the post stage ‘fight’ on YouTube? Our dinner table was entertained…. How he got away with only 400CHF in fines mystifies me.

Both Greg LeMond and Phil Anderson have said it – the Tours of the 80′s regularly included cobbled sections; indeed it was a great and exciting part of the race. A painful one, though, and one to be avoided if at all possible. But if it’s part of the race, so be it. Like the mountain stages and the flat stages, the slippery roads and the crosswinds: it’s what makes up a Tour de France. Yes, it adds risk – but surely no more so than racing down a mountain pass or taking on a twisty, narrow sprint finish. Phil (on SBS TV) called modern riders a bit “precious” about this year’s re-inclusion of cobbles whilst admitting it makes a great spectacle for the viewer rather than an easier, safer ride for the pro bike racer.

Phil was also asked about Cancellara‘s ‘control’ of the “risk” on the stage won by Chavenal, at the expense of those who had suffered and clawed their way back to the front in search of points (like McEwen and Hushovd). Rightly, Phil pointed out the obvious conflict of interest in a rider seemingly annulling a stage (his teammate Andy Shleck had been gapped for example) and pointedly called Cancellara a “bully”. Well Fabian may actually be a very nice guy (Scott Sunderland said so earlier this week so it’s probably true) but he certainly displayed a degree of self-assured “Tour Patron” aura not seen since Lance was the Boss. Or maybe not since Hinault last pulled on the yellow jersey and gave the peleton a piece of his mind.

Cobblestones, Crashes, And Potential Winners Of The Tour | Cyclingnews.com

Anyway, the inclusion of cobbles was a controversial move in this year’s race, and led to a lot of complaints. What people forget is that up until the mid ’80s, the Tour regularly featured a Paris-Roubaix-like stage. By the time I raced in the Tour I had already competed in three Paris-Roubaix races.

One difference between then and now is the fact that many of the current Tour riders have no experience on the cobbles. But when I started racing, the fascination with cycling wasn’t just the Tour de France. It was the photos of the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix which hit my imagination. That was a big part of the romance of the sport. And that’s why, just after the first Junior Worlds I rode, I jumped at the chance to go race in Europe with Kent Gordis. We were competitors in my first year of racing, but by this time we were friends.

addicted2wheels: On conflicts of interest and cycling – or how vested interests can pervert an event

there’s money on the line here and decisions were made on the road by individuals with a vested interest in the final result. Now if the riders were not connected by radio to team directors I’d be less inclined to question their motivations, but in any event it was obvious that neutralising the stage was in the best interests of several teams – and perhaps the majority. And the minority who were coerced into following what the Saxo Bank team wanted could do nothing. Oh sure, they could’ve attacked when the main field regrouped but they would also have been chased down by the man with the yellow jersey on his back and given at least some sort of tongue-lashing, or worse.

Both Greg LeMond and Phil Anderson have said it – the Tours of the 80′s regularly included cobbled sections; indeed it was a great and exciting part of the race. A painful one, though, and one to be avoided if at all possible. But if it’s part of the race, so be it. Like the mountain stages and the flat stages, the slippery roads and the crosswinds: it’s what makes up a Tour de France. Yes, it adds risk – but surely no more so than racing down a mountain pass or taking on a twisty, narrow sprint finish. Phil (on SBS TV) called modern riders a bit “precious” about this year’s re-inclusion of cobbles whilst admitting it makes a great spectacle for the viewer rather than an easier, safer ride for the pro bike racer.

Phil was also asked about Cancellara‘s ‘control’ of the “risk” on the stage won by Chavenal, at the expense of those who had suffered and clawed their way back to the front in search of points (like McEwen and Hushovd). Rightly, Phil pointed out the obvious conflict of interest in a rider seemingly annulling a stage (his teammate Andy Shleck had been gapped for example) and pointedly called Cancellara a “bully”. Well Fabian may actually be a very nice guy (Scott Sunderland said so earlier this week so it’s probably true) but he certainly displayed a degree of self-assured “Tour Patron” aura not seen since Lance was the Boss. Or maybe not since Hinault last pulled on the yellow jersey and gave the peleton a piece of his mind.

Cobblestones, Crashes, And Potential Winners Of The Tour | Cyclingnews.com

Anyway, the inclusion of cobbles was a controversial move in this year’s race, and led to a lot of complaints. What people forget is that up until the mid ’80s, the Tour regularly featured a Paris-Roubaix-like stage. By the time I raced in the Tour I had already competed in three Paris-Roubaix races.

One difference between then and now is the fact that many of the current Tour riders have no experience on the cobbles. But when I started racing, the fascination with cycling wasn’t just the Tour de France. It was the photos of the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix which hit my imagination. That was a big part of the romance of the sport. And that’s why, just after the first Junior Worlds I rode, I jumped at the chance to go race in Europe with Kent Gordis. We were competitors in my first year of racing, but by this time we were friends.

addicted2wheels: On conflicts of interest and cycling – or how vested interests can pervert an event

there’s money on the line here and decisions were made on the road by individuals with a vested interest in the final result. Now if the riders were not connected by radio to team directors I’d be less inclined to question their motivations, but in any event it was obvious that neutralising the stage was in the best interests of several teams – and perhaps the majority. And the minority who were coerced into following what the Saxo Bank team wanted could do nothing. Oh sure, they could’ve attacked when the main field regrouped but they would also have been chased down by the man with the yellow jersey on his back and given at least some sort of tongue-lashing, or worse.

Le Tour Stage 2 was really interesting on several levels. On one level it was simply too dangerous and unfair to continue racing when so many top riders had been delayed by forces largely out of their control (ie a wet road/oil slick combo that claimed nearly everyone). It’s hard to blame them for wanting to annul the stage on that basis.

OTOH there’s money on the line here and decisions were made on the road by individuals with a vested interest in the final result. Now if the riders were not connected by radio to team directors I’d be less inclined to question their motivations, but in any event it was obvious that neutralising the stage was in the best interests of several teams – and perhaps the majority. And the minority who were coerced into following what the Saxo Bank team wanted could do nothing. Oh sure, they could’ve attacked when the main field regrouped but they would also have been chased down by the man with the yellow jersey on his back and given at least some sort of tongue-lashing, or worse.

Of course if they always behaved so nicely and cooperatively no-one would ever have to chase after a fall – they’d wait for ‘em to catch up. And sometimes, like on Stage 2, that’s what happens. Maybe that’s all there is to it.

So to summarise it was interesting to see…

• Cancellara taking “control” and coordinating what ‘seemed’ to be a uniform group decision to neutralise the stage
• The race referee – let’s call him chief commissaire – negotiating and shaking hands with Cancellara, effectively confirming Cancellara’s status as spokesperson on the road (the ‘yellow jersey effect’?)
• Most riders – barring those who vented afterwards or who moved out of line right at the finish – complying with Cancellara’s “directions”
• The post-race decision to annul all points except Chavanel’s (after all he was the only one actually racing the last 15km or more)
• And the hidden element – the race radios. What was going on in those rider-director conversations? Was it just ‘wait for Andy’ or something more? Was there collusion between teams?   

addicted2wheels

Whilst the riders make the race and must ride to the conditions – free will reigns over contracted obligations – they are also a part of a large, well financed enterprise. The biggest part, to be sure. But when other organisations and individuals make important decisions like this that have huge flow-on effects they are governed independently to monitor and control for conflicts of interest. Is professional sport any different? Apparently, yes.

Cadel’s Diary | Cadel Evans 2009-2010 – The Official Site of Cadel Evans – World Champion 2009, Tour de France runner-up in 2007,2008.

Today, because of the number of guys who went down, the group agreed not to sprint. Considering the number of guys injured, the danger of the last 10km, I’m sorry for the spectators, but it was the right thing to do. Sorry, we are human as well. Don’t fear, for the masochists amongst you, there will be plenty of suffering/crashes/damage to come…probably most of it tomorrow…

Robbie Hunter (RobbieHunter) on Twitter

See how much you guys like hitting the deck at 60km/h …..

Le Tour Stage 2 was really interesting on several levels. On one level it was simply too dangerous and unfair to continue racing when so many top riders had been delayed by forces largely out of their control (ie a wet road/oil slick combo that claimed nearly everyone). It’s hard to blame them for wanting to annul the stage on that basis.

OTOH there’s money on the line here and decisions were made on the road by individuals with a vested interest in the final result. Now if the riders were not connected by radio to team directors I’d be less inclined to question their motivations, but in any event it was obvious that neutralising the stage was in the best interests of several teams – and perhaps the majority. And the minority who were coerced into following what the Saxo Bank team wanted could do nothing. Oh sure, they could’ve attacked when the main field regrouped but they would also have been chased down by the man with the yellow jersey on his back and given at least some sort of tongue-lashing, or worse.

Of course if they always behaved so nicely and cooperatively no-one would ever have to chase after a fall – they’d wait for ‘em to catch up. And sometimes, like on Stage 2, that’s what happens. Maybe that’s all there is to it.

So to summarise it was interesting to see…

• Cancellara taking “control” and coordinating what ‘seemed’ to be a uniform group decision to neutralise the stage
• The race referee – let’s call him chief commissaire – negotiating and shaking hands with Cancellara, effectively confirming Cancellara’s status as spokesperson on the road (the ‘yellow jersey effect’?)
• Most riders – barring those who vented afterwards or who moved out of line right at the finish – complying with Cancellara’s “directions”
• The post-race decision to annul all points except Chavanel’s (after all he was the only one actually racing the last 15km or more)
• And the hidden element – the race radios. What was going on in those rider-director conversations? Was it just ‘wait for Andy’ or something more? Was there collusion between teams?   

addicted2wheels

Whilst the riders make the race and must ride to the conditions – free will reigns over contracted obligations – they are also a part of a large, well financed enterprise. The biggest part, to be sure. But when other organisations and individuals make important decisions like this that have huge flow-on effects they are governed independently to monitor and control for conflicts of interest. Is professional sport any different? Apparently, yes.

Cadel’s Diary | Cadel Evans 2009-2010 – The Official Site of Cadel Evans – World Champion 2009, Tour de France runner-up in 2007,2008.

Today, because of the number of guys who went down, the group agreed not to sprint. Considering the number of guys injured, the danger of the last 10km, I’m sorry for the spectators, but it was the right thing to do. Sorry, we are human as well. Don’t fear, for the masochists amongst you, there will be plenty of suffering/crashes/damage to come…probably most of it tomorrow…

Robbie Hunter (RobbieHunter) on Twitter

See how much you guys like hitting the deck at 60km/h …..

All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players; procycling is just a game played out for our entertainment, why take it all so seriously? Ahh, but there’s money and prestige involved. Of course we are also bound by ethics to be fair, just and honest in all our dealings with both ourselves and our fellow human beings. By cheating we are effectively pushing ahead in the queue or bullying for gain. It’s clearly, utterly wrong. And very human.

Now I do believe Cancellara is innocent of this alleged “doping bike” cheat but I have no way to prove it. It’s just a trust, a belief in the system. Why would someone of his stature have to cheat, and why would they risk all? Of course that argument doesn’t stand up either, if it did then we wouldn’t have seen prominent riders subverting medicine and pharmaceutics in order to cheat.

So we are just back to trust and faith.  

Team Saxo Bank Rejects Insinuations Of Mechanical Doping | Cyclingnews.com

Team Saxo Bank has issued a strongly worded statement denying that Fabian Cancellara or any rider in Bjarne Riis’ team has ever used any form of ‘mechanical doping’ and has dismissed a popular video circulating on the internet that investigates the use of an electric engine as ‘a work of fiction, disguised as documentary.’

All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players; procycling is just a game played out for our entertainment, why take it all so seriously? Ahh, but there’s money and prestige involved. Of course we are also bound by ethics to be fair, just and honest in all our dealings with both ourselves and our fellow human beings. By cheating we are effectively pushing ahead in the queue or bullying for gain. It’s clearly, utterly wrong. And very human.

Now I do believe Cancellara is innocent of this alleged “doping bike” cheat but I have no way to prove it. It’s just a trust, a belief in the system. Why would someone of his stature have to cheat, and why would they risk all? Of course that argument doesn’t stand up either, if it did then we wouldn’t have seen prominent riders subverting medicine and pharmaceutics in order to cheat.

So we are just back to trust and faith.  

Team Saxo Bank Rejects Insinuations Of Mechanical Doping | Cyclingnews.com

Team Saxo Bank has issued a strongly worded statement denying that Fabian Cancellara or any rider in Bjarne Riis’ team has ever used any form of ‘mechanical doping’ and has dismissed a popular video circulating on the internet that investigates the use of an electric engine as ‘a work of fiction, disguised as documentary.’

Riis is a bit biased in this, and he does make a good point about the timing of Cancellara’s attack – but what was Boonen to do? He had already attacked on the cobbles to thin the lead bunch out, and he had softened a few legs. But he had to rest at some point, regather his energy, have a bite to eat. Cancellara had only to follow his wheel, match his attacks and wait for the moment. Which he did.

And when the break was made, Boonen was down the back of an elite bunch. He would have expected someone else to chase Cancellara, but of course they didn’t. Not with commitment anyway. And why should they tow sprinters like Hushovd and Boonen to the line, anyway? So there you have it – Boonen needed a rest after doing a lot of legwork, and noone was going to tow the others back to Cancellara. So Boonen was trapped. Had he been more alert and closer to Cancellara he may well have responded and brought him back, but he had already done too much.

And if he’d done nothing? 

Riis Reveals The Secret Of Cancellara’s Roubaix Attack | Cyclingnews.com

“Boonen is strong but Cancellara is better. He’s great,” he said with total admiration.

“Boonen made mistakes during the race. How many? Two can be too many. I think if you want to win this race you have to stay calm, relaxed and not stressed. Then go when you have to go.

“The problem for the others is that Fabian goes fast, even on his own. We know that and it’s a bonus to have. We know he can go from far away, too, so we use this as part of our strategy. Not many riders can do that.”

Riis is a bit biased in this, and he does make a good point about the timing of Cancellara’s attack – but what was Boonen to do? He had already attacked on the cobbles to thin the lead bunch out, and he had softened a few legs. But he had to rest at some point, regather his energy, have a bite to eat. Cancellara had only to follow his wheel, match his attacks and wait for the moment. Which he did.

And when the break was made, Boonen was down the back of an elite bunch. He would have expected someone else to chase Cancellara, but of course they didn’t. Not with commitment anyway. And why should they tow sprinters like Hushovd and Boonen to the line, anyway? So there you have it – Boonen needed a rest after doing a lot of legwork, and noone was going to tow the others back to Cancellara. So Boonen was trapped. Had he been more alert and closer to Cancellara he may well have responded and brought him back, but he had already done too much.

And if he’d done nothing? 

Riis Reveals The Secret Of Cancellara’s Roubaix Attack | Cyclingnews.com

“Boonen is strong but Cancellara is better. He’s great,” he said with total admiration.

“Boonen made mistakes during the race. How many? Two can be too many. I think if you want to win this race you have to stay calm, relaxed and not stressed. Then go when you have to go.

“The problem for the others is that Fabian goes fast, even on his own. We know that and it’s a bonus to have. We know he can go from far away, too, so we use this as part of our strategy. Not many riders can do that.”